Special Notes
Possible Mechanical Treatments
This column cannot be specific in all cases.
It is the job of the contestants to pick out the treatments that apply.
For example, a field can be found that would need no mechanical treatment
for the most intensive use. Therefore, practice 20 would be shown. A similar
field in soil, slope, and erosion could be covered with undesirable brush
and trees and would need practice 14. Should a field also be gullied, practices
14 and 19 would be used. Depending on soil, slope, cover, erosion, and
most intensive use, practices 14, 15, 16, or 15 and 16 could be the correct
answer.
Class I land in grass or cultivation would
require practice 20. The same class of land covered by brush and trees
would require practice 14. In other words, any field will need to have
one or more of the possible mechanical practices checked that are shown
under the heading "Mechanical" on the scorecard.
Other Factors
"Other factors" shown on the condition sheet
will be a key to treatment needs. These treatments are not shown under
mechanical treatments, but have been discussed elsewhere in this booklet.
When conditions warrant, these will be noted on the condition sheet along
with other given information. The contestant will need to check the appropriate
condition on the scorecard.
| All explanations given in this booklet are for teaching and understanding.Because
of the possibility of overlooking a difference between the narratives and
the tables, the tables will be the final word in contest situations. |
Setting Up and Holding a Land Judging Contest
Plan
The coordinator or chairman needs to set up
a meeting of interested leaders and agencies. Determine who can help and
make assignments. As soon as the contest date is set, leaders should select
judges, helpers, and graders. In planning, consider the number of teams,
divisions, and number of individuals that will participate. A team consists
of three or four contestants, with the three high scores tabulated as the
official team score.
Site Selection
Locate a farm where different conditions can
be found to judge. Secure permission from the owner to use the area. Select
four sites, dig pits, and prepare an official scoring key for each site,
before the contest. This will insure that graders can score the contest
in the shortest possible time.
Preparing Field Sites
Each site should have colored flags to indicate
field boundaries of the area to be judged. The fields should be a minimum
of 100 feet x 100 feet in size, but it does not necessarily have to be
square. Two well-marked stakes should be placed 100 feet apart for contestants
to use to determine slope. These should be the same distance above the
ground and as much as possible with the normal slope of the land. A hole
or trench must be dug to expose the depth of the soil profile. It is best
to use string to mark off an area in the trench as an "off limits area"
that contestants use only to determine topsoil thickness and soil depth.
Representative topsoil and subsoil samples should be available in boxes
and appropriately marked. If the soil is very dry, a water bottle should
be available to moisten soil samples.
Site Card
This card provides the contestant with all
necessary information to judge the site. It should be prepared in advance
and placed at the site before the contest. Include the field number, thickness
of original topsoil, soil test data, and any other factors on the card.
Conducting the Contest
Register teams by using consecutive
numbers, and team members by using 1,2,3,4. Have sets of land judging cards
prepared ahead of time if a large number of contestants are expected. When
the contest begins, #1 contestant will go to site 1, #2 to site 2, #3 to
site 3, and #4 to site 4. Allow 15 to 20 minutes to judge each site. Additional
time will be required if homesite evaluation is also being judged. Use
a signal to start and stop the judging at each site. Each group then moves
to the next site. Group 1 goes to site 2, Group 2 to site 3, Group 3 to
site 4, and Group 4 to site 1. Sites do not always have to be arranged
to fit this sequence. When using the computerized card, collecting of card
is done when the contestant completes the last site. Have someone designated
to pick up the cards and take them to the graders. This procedure allows
groups of 20 to 40 people to move without confusion.

General Contest Rules
1. No talking, comparing, or copying of cards.
2. Clear plastic clipboards are allowed.
3. No water bottles. Water to moisten soil
will be provided as needed.
4. No bubble vile, tape measure, or other
measuring devices are allowed.
5. Contestants can have the following pieces
of equipment:
a. soft lead writing pencil
with a good eraser.
b. knife or nail.
c. towel or rag.
d. contest cards.
6. The land judging handbook shall be used
to resolve contest differences and should be used in setting up and conducting
all contests.
7. Decisions of the judges will be FINAL!
Scoring and Grading
Categories on the scorecard carry varying
values depending on the judges evaluation of its relative importance. The
total points possible on each site are 75 with 45 points from Part I and
30 points from Part II. See the following example. In Part I, items have
only one correct answer, except "Major Factors" must have all appropriate
blocks checked to get credit for the answer. In Part II, the applicable
vegetative, mechanical, and fertilizer practices are checked according
to the judgment of the contestant and other given factors. No partial credit
is awarded.
Use a master sheet to simplify the entry of
individual scores by listing team members vertically and sites horizontally
on the sheet. Circle the low total score for elimination. Team scores can
then be added up quickly.
In the case of a tie in the team score, first
use the score of the 4th individual. If one team has only three members,
the team with the 4th member is the winner. If a tie still exists, use
the scores from Site 1, then use Site 2, Site 3, and Site 4 and the team
with the first largest score can be declared the winner. If this does not
break the tie, the score from Part I, then Part II of Site 1, Site 2, Site
3, and Site 4 can be used. If this procedure fails, all team names with
tied scores can be placed in a hat and drawn for placings. This same procedure
can be used to break individual tied scores.
| Example of Scoring for Land Judging. |
Part I of Land Judging
Scorecard |
Part II of Land
Judging Scorecard |
| Items |
Points |
Possible
Practices |
Points |
| A. Texture |
- |
No. 3 |
6 |
| Surface |
4 |
- |
- |
| Subsoil |
4 |
No. 5 |
4 |
| B. Depth of Soil |
5 |
No. 6 |
5 |
| C. Slope |
4 |
No. 16 |
6 |
| D. Erosion |
4 |
No. 16 |
4 |
| E. Permeability |
5 |
No. 25 |
5 |
| F. Surface Runoff |
3 |
- |
- |
| G. Major Factors |
8 |
- |
- |
| H. Land Capability |
- |
- |
- |
| Class |
8 |
- |
- |
| - |
Points 45 |
Points |
30 |
| - |
Total |
Points 75 |
- |
to see
Land Judging Score Card
click here
Next Page